#3 

Mass murder (arson)

Freud?: I would like to perpetrate mass murder (arson).

Firebrand

If we accept that the murderous arsonist’s letter, of February 22, 1915, was written by Freud, the obvious question is whether other similarly murderous letters, in the published collection of their exchange, even though ascribed to Ferenczi, were authored by Freud.
Thus, In the letter of October 27, 1914, written four months earlier - yet another murderous confession - allegedly Ferenczi wrote: on account of a slight injury to my homosexual complexes, I would like to perpetrate mass murder (arson). (1)
Considering Freud’s homosexual complexes, and his predilection for murders and fires, this sounds more like Freud than Ferenczi.
And it was Freud, not Ferenczi – who suffered a slight – in Freudian newspeak a bad – injury to his homosexual complexes when he lost his beloved Teutonic crown prince, Jung, only a year earlier, in 1913.
Further, the letter's author disclosed that he had already committed criminal acts.
This confession is, he wrote, an admission … that I …  have these [murderous] desires even now and also allow them to be actualized once or twice a year. (1)

So, the author of the letter confessed that, once or twice a year, he was starting murderous fires, and that he still felt the urge to continue setting fires. As a way of explanation, he added:
In my youth the fierce struggle against masturbation occupied and tormented me for years. I now think about the "primal scene" postulated by you. Perhaps I was punished all too severely after that "masculine" protest (urinating). (1)
(Let’s disregard the interjected phrase, postulated by you, which doesn’t seem to fit in the context.)
So, we have three elements that the author relates to his murderous need for setting fires:
1. the compulsion to masturbate,
2. the primal scene, and
3. urination.

Freud's primary addiction

Could Freud be the author?

Addicted to his penis

Freud’s legendary masturbation followed him throughout his life, he even included it in his theorising. He also mentioned it in his letters to his boyfriend, Fliess, on 22 December 1897
As he informed him, masturbation is the one major habit, 'the primary addiction', and it is only as a substitute …  other addictions - to alcohol, morphine, tobacco, and the like come into existence. The role played by this addiction in hysteria is enormous; and it is perhaps … my major, still outstanding obstacle. (2)
Thus, Freud’s incessant masturbation resulted, not only in his lifelong addiction to tobacco, and cocaine but also in his hysteria - not necessarily in this order - and it was his masturbation that was the major …  obstacle to him becoming “normal”. (It never happened.)

Scarred for life by the primal scene

Moreover, it was Freud who, in his partly fictional story of Wolfman (1918), coined the term primal scene denoting witnessing one’s parents having sex. Already, 21 years later, in the letter to Fliess, on May 2, 1897, Freud mentioned this notion. (3)
And, in the Interpretation of Dreams, Freud described having witnessed the primal scene, and his reaction to it in the form of calls of nature. (4)
As he revealed, Freud was severely reprimanded by his father for his actions.

Wilhelm Fliess, Freud's love of his life

Freud’s homosexual complexes 

Since Ferenczi replaced Jung, in Freud’s affections and bed, Freud’s homosexual complexes were well known to Ferenczi, before whom Freud didn't have to pretend to be heterosexual.
Thus, in a letter to Ferenczi, on October 6, 1910, Freud revealed to him that,
Since Fliess' [ex-boyfriend’s] case... part of [my] homosexual investment [energy] has been withdrawn. (5)
But only partly, since his homosexual relations continued unabated, 

Overcoming homosexuality

Notably, in another letter to Ferenczi, on October 17, 1910, thus only a week later, Freud mentioned that Ferenczi was, imagining completely different secrets than [those] I have reserved for myself. (6)
There’s a Freudian kind of logic to the statement. In more normal contexts, secrets are always reserved for oneself, or they wouldn’t be secrets, but Freud wasn’t normal.
Ferenczi, as it appears, had an inkling about Freud living a double life, a professor in the daytime, and a criminal at night. In the same letter, Freud referred to his (failed), “overcoming my homosexuality” - a disconcerting issue for him.

Saving Freud's victims

Freud the murderous arsonist

Freud fulfilled perfectly the three conditions that point to him as the author. of the letter of October 27, 1914, who has the murderous need for setting fires:
1. the compulsion to masturbate  - Freud's main addiction
2. the primal scene - seeing his parents engage in intercourse
3. urination - relieving himself at the sight of the primal scene.

A petroleur 

As it is obvious, Freud didn’t keep his penchant for arson secret, at least from his boyfriends. Already aged 12, Freud displayed this kind of incendiary aggression. Hence, in the letter of August 15, 1877, to his boyfriend at the time, Eduard Silberstein, he announced: I have not enough hate to express my feelings ... In times like these one is tempted to turn into a petroleur [a fire-bomber]. (7)
Whether the young Freud turned words into action, then and there, is unknown but not impossible.

Mass murder (arson)?

Mass murder

Without a doubt, Freud was a murderous character, employing, among others, arson as a means of destruction of property and human life.
If you want to kill lots of people in one go, burning the house, they live in, in the middle of the night, is a splendid idea. Actually, from an arsonist's point of view, burning a theatre with hundreds of people is an even better idea. Bud did he?

Veiled in secrecy

As Martin Grotjahn in his article about Freud's letter writing revealed,
The correspondence between Freud and Sandor Ferenczi is veiled in secrecy. The number of letters has been variously estimated between several hundred and two thousand. Ernest Jones decided not to publish any of this correspondence in his Freud biography. Ernst Freud, president of the Sigmund Freud Archives, [and Freud's son] published a few letters. (8)
Why would there be a need for such secrecy? And since, by now, the letters have been published, does it mean there’s no longer a need for secrecy?
Notably, the published correspondence is a selection of letters allowed to see the light of day. From the quotes already presented, it is apparent that Freud had no secrets before his boyfriend in Budapest putting on paper, just like it was the case previously with Fliess, the description of his criminal thoughts and acts. No wonder that the correspondence remained under wraps for decennia!
Without a doubt, consideringt the explosive content of Freud's letters to Ferenczi,  there were lots of good, or rather bad, reasons, for keeping the correspondence secret. Had it not been for Grotjahn's revelation, we would never have known about Freud the murderous arsonist. Now, we do!
(1) Ferenczi, Sandor & Freud, Sigmund, The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi, Volume 2, 1914-1919, (1996, p. 20).
(2) Freud, Sigmund, The complete letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904, (1985, p. 287).
(3) Freud, (1985, p. 239).
(4) SE 4, p. 216.
(5) Ferenczi & Freud, (1996, p. 221).
(6) Ferenczi & Freud, (1996, p. 237).
(7) Freud, Sigmund & Silberstein, Eduard, The Letters of Sigmund Freud to Eduard Silberstein 1871–1881, (1991, p. 164).
(8) Grotjahn, Grotjahn, Martin, Sigmund Freud and the Art of Letter Writing, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. CC, No. 1 (Apr. 3, 1967), pp. 13-18; in Ruitenbeek, Hendrik M., ed., Freud as We Knew Him, (1973, p. 444).